> Concepts don’t automatically change because things happen “on the internet”. There's no magic to the web: it is and always been pages you can access by knowi

> Concepts don’t automatically change because things happen “on the internet”. There's no magic to the web: it is and always been pages you can access by knowing or finding urls. It's up to servers to decide how to serve things. I'd propose a better analogy to what publishers are doing on the web: they are renting public billboards, posting contents on them and somehow wanting people to close their eyes or pay to look at them. This is what most (but not all) web is today. And it doesn't have to be that way. Web3 is hinting at a different world. Not saying it's a better or perfect world but in theory it is one where content owners have more control over who/how they distribute content to.