4 ms·
New York and Atlanta DC only. I wrote down pros/cons of various ~$5 and below VPS services in a Gist I have been maintaining for a couple of years: https://gis
by frafra 6y ago
New York and Atlanta DC only.
I wrote down pros/cons of various ~$5 and below VPS services in a Gist I have been maintaining for a couple of years: https://gist.github.com/frafra/4688b146ca6d55accb768c3557939477 https://gist.github.com/frafra/4688b146ca6d55accb768c3557939...
- sumedh 6y agoAh ok, I am using a $5 DO server as file server in Singapore, I thought I might save a few more bucks by moving to vultr but its ok $5 is pretty cheap.
- mmahemoff 6y agoHope you can add Linode here. I've been a long time user and it's a pretty good & popular option imo.
- frafra 6y agoI use Linode, but it was $10 or more, while I've just seen there's also a $5 VPS called "Nanode". I added it to the list and I will test it more in the future. Thank you!
- jwr 6y agoNot if you need any CPU performance to speak of. Given the misleading "vCPUs" that we are sold, I took some time to benchmark several major cloud providers and the results were… worrying: https://jan.rychter.com/enblog/cloud-server-cpu-performance-comparison-2019-12-12 https://jan.rychter.com/enblog/cloud-server-cpu-performance-... BTW, I run my SaaS on real servers from Hetzner. I figured I won't need instant auto-scaling anyway, and if you provision with ansible it doesn't really matter if it's an EC2 instance or a real server. What does matter is the price and the performance: I get servers which are significantly faster than anything you can get on AWS, and for a much better price. To be honest, I do not understand the drive towards AWS. It makes sense in micro-deployments (lightsail and/or lambda, when your usage is sporadic) and in large deployments that need dynamic scaling. But it does not make much sense anywhere in the middle.
- nrvn 6y agoWords of sense are rare to be heard. There has been a lot of comparisons and benchmarks and there will be even more. After some point monthly bills grow to the scale where it makes perfect sense to invest money and time into your own infra. Yet People will still be throwing money into the hype oven.
- pdimitar 6y agoGood article, thank you for it. I only heard good things about Hetzner from many people, incl. networking setup. As an owner of an iMac Pro (the 10c/20t CPU variant) I have to tell you that you are slightly mistaken -- the Xeon-2150B is a pretty strong CPU even compared to the bursty high-end desktop i9 CPUs. Sure I mostly do parallel compilation and work with (and produce) highly parallel programs, and there it really really shines. But even for the occasional huge JS compilation it still performs pretty well. (Turbo boost puts it at about 4.3Ghz is the max I've seen.) The iMac Pro's only real downside is that it has only 4 memory channels so as lightning-fast its NVMe SSD is, and as efficient the CPU with its huge caches is, the machine can likely perform anywhere from 30% to 80% faster if it had 8 memory channels. But in general, iMac Pro is a very, and I really mean very, solid developer / design / professional software user machine. I mean, all of that doesn't matter much in a world where the Threadripper 3960x / 3970x / 3990x now exist but still. iMac Pro is still the best Mac you can buy (Mac Pro 2019 uses the very last possible high-end desktop Xeons and I don't think Intel will be making many more of these; AMD is definitely on their tails and I don't think Apple will produce that many Mac Pros). That being said, I am looking forward to buy a Threadripper 3990x monster machine somewhere in the next 1-2 years with dual 4k or 5k displays. Hopefully the Linux community will finally get its act together and make proper sub-pixel font aliasing by then...
- jwr 6y ago> As an owner of an iMac Pro (the 10c/20t CPU variant) I have to tell you that you are slightly mistaken -- the Xeon-2150B is a pretty strong CPU even compared to the bursty high-end desktop i9 CPUs. I do not think I am mistaken. I haven't yet encountered a Xeon that can beat the desktop i9 in single-core performance. Looking at geekbench scores (https://browser.geekbench.com/mac-benchmarks https://browser.geekbench.com/mac-benchmarks), my iMac is 10.5% faster in single-core than your iMac Pro, and your iMac Pro is about 15% faster in multi-core. For development work, I will take single-core performance any day.
- hedora 6y agoCloudSigma is another player in that space. (No affiliation)
- frafra 6y agoYou are right, I have never heard of that thanks. I just added them to the list.
- dan15 6y agoYour list is missing quite a few major providers in the "low end" VPS space, such as BuyVM, Ramnode, Virmach, HostHatch, and probably others I'm forgetting.
- frafra 6y agoThanks, I read your comment on the gist too; I added them, but I have no direct experience. My gist was not intended to be complete, but a mostly EU well known VPS providers. A proper git repository with a nice markdown table would be better probably.
- abiogenesis 6y agoI personally use RamNode (a very small, 128M instance as a backup DNS in their Amsterdam DC) and can't really fault them. They've been rock solid so far.
- paulcarroty 6y agoHeard good stuff 'bout Ramnode.
- pdimitar 6y agoThis will work much better as an online spreadsheet. Thank you for the effort though!
- paulcarroty 6y agohttps://toys.lerdorf.com/low-cost-vps-testing https://toys.lerdorf.com/low-cost-vps-testing