4 ms·
This doesn't say that it was a damaged fuel rod, only that that is a possibility and that it has been discovered to be the cause of similar readings previously.
by guerrilla 6y ago
This doesn't say that it was a damaged fuel rod, only that that is a possibility and that it has been discovered to be the cause of similar readings previously.
- aaron695 6y agoI'm not sure what more you want exactly? What are you suggesting it could be? You have the data from multiple agencies, what fits? I'm happy for alternatives, but multiple agencies say it's civilian and Russia. I want to leave this crazy, it's weapons and it's machine reading malfunctions threads. So given the data what are you saying it could be? This is why the comment section exists, to work towards to better understanding what is going on. Unless you are from Russia trying to sow doubt, you have to give a plausible alternative that fits the data. Saying it's possible it's something else is just sowing disinformation.
- guerrilla 6y ago> I'm not sure what more you want exactly? What are you suggesting it could be? Nothing. I'm pointing out the agency did not phrase it as strongly as you did for people who can't or don't want to read the article. > This is why the comment section exists, to work towards to better understanding what is going on. Unless you are from Russia trying to sow doubt, you have to give a plausible alternative that fits the data. Saying it's possible it's something else is just sowing disinformation. I'm no expert and not capable of judging whether people commenting know what they're talking about or not. All I see from official sources is that experts are saying that a leak from Western Russia is a likely possibility. I can wait until more concrete information comes out to make a judgement.