It'll be very interesting to see if a social media network exclusively of political content will be viable. Twitter may have a lot of politics on it, but that's

It'll be very interesting to see if a social media network exclusively of political content will be viable. Twitter may have a lot of politics on it, but that's not its raison d'etre. I have to laugh at the article though: >“With Devin Nunes came a whole pack of haters,” said Matze. He said that parody accounts are fine and even welcome, but Parler draws a line when it comes to spammers. “You can’t spam people’s comment sections with unrelated content,” he said. Well, firstly, it's well documented that Devin Nunes has sued parody accounts, and seccondly, making editorial decisions about which comments are suitably related is the editorial control that right wing partisans are falsly claiming is a red line abot twitter. Given that we know Parler is offering a bounty for users, how much did they pay CNBC for the puff piece?