8 ms·
I have to say, at the very least, the UI is a breath of fresh air compared to new Reddit. New Reddit is just...I can't quite put my finger on it, but it just fe
by TulliusCicero 6y ago
I have to say, at the very least, the UI is a breath of fresh air compared to new Reddit. New Reddit is just...I can't quite put my finger on it, but it just feels awful to look at.
- glenstein 6y agoAbsolutely. It's not a bad interface, and for better or for worse I think this is critically important to get right, and was a huge part of Mastodon's success. I think so many other well-intentioned projects fail because of inscrutable interfaces, so it is good to see the UI taken seriously.
- TulliusCicero 6y agoOh, has Mastodon been successful? I haven't heard much about that.
- riffic 6y agoThe ecosystem is very successful: https://twitter.com/freemancw/status/1276287684814594048 https://twitter.com/freemancw/status/1276287684814594048
- codetrotter 6y agoIt’s a little bit ironic that the post you link to was posted on Twitter though, isn’t it? :^) Teasing aside, I like Mastodon. I’ve used it a bit myself too, and I have a profile on an instance of it.
- buzzkillington 6y agoSuccess is not a meaningful metric. Gopher is a success when you browse wikipedia on it.
- ehsankia 6y agoWhile I agree that new reddit is awful, I still much prefer old reddit to this. Also what's up with this new trend of having the main content width-restricted, but not the header [0]? The new GitHub UI that went live this week has the exact same problem on wide screens. What kind of UX designer ever approved such a mess and why do so many sites do this? The main UI itself, again very width restricted, but also has strange paddings [1] which limit severely the area for the title (which is the most important UI element). Doesn't really make sense to me. The vertical centering is a bit of a mess, and the size of icons is also either way too big or way too small [2]. [0] https://i.imgur.com/gZEWEdJ.png https://i.imgur.com/gZEWEdJ.png [1] https://i.imgur.com/nayP548.png https://i.imgur.com/nayP548.png [2] https://i.imgur.com/XZPToxy.png https://i.imgur.com/XZPToxy.png EDIT: Huh, I hadn't used new reddit in a long time, I actually took a look now and it seems like it has improved significantly. I actually don't hate it as much, it looks much closer to old reddit now, with full width content and much less padding [3] [3] https://i.imgur.com/c1QBucR.png https://i.imgur.com/c1QBucR.png
- buzzert 6y agoAgreed. At least old Reddit didn’t require JS to load anything a didn’t show spinners every time you clicked on something.
- IggleSniggle 6y ago"New" reddit (not that new anymore) still _frequently_ just gets stuck on the spinners. Also with some frequency, when navigating to a page I've been to before, it will load everything from cache nicely, and then REPLACE THE CACHE WITH SPINNERS THAT NEVER LOAD THE CONTENT. Sometimes it will do this with a page I've never visited before, ie it will load the page and then replace it with the spinners and never load. Worst of both worlds. Grinds my gears. The _old_ reddit always just worked. I never had to reload the page multiple times, sometimes giving up entirely. Obviously I'm still using the site or I wouldn't be complaining, but like, what exactly was wrong with old reddit again?
- ehsankia 6y ago
- roenxi 6y ago> JavaScript is required for this page. Offering a second opinion; they barely know how to display text without using JavaScript. There is a lot of room for technical improvement.
- worble 6y agoYeah, enabling JS meant it's already worse than old reddit, but I gave it the benefit of the doubt just to give it a read and enabled JS, only to be greeted with a neverending spinner. No console errors either, just the eternal spinner of doom.
- chaosharmonic 6y agoIt also devours resources compared to the old version
- ashtonkem 6y agoMy biggest anger with new reddit is that it just doesn’t work. It’s rare that a video will play twice without a reload, infuriating if you want to share a funny video with a spouse, and it will regularly go into a mode where all videos stop working until a complete reload happens. This has been a consistent drag on my reddit usage now that my primary consumption of sites like this is via my iPad, and I suspect I’m not alone.
- michaelmrose 6y agoDo you use reddit on a mobile browser?
- ashtonkem 6y agoYes, I said that.
- michaelmrose 6y agoReddit has been garbage on mobile browsers for a while have you tried any of the unofficial reddit apps? I in particular like RIF but there are several.
- ashtonkem 6y agoAs a general rule, I avoid native apps for most social media platforms, just to avoid over-using them.
- lazyjones 6y agoIt's the same on desktop Safari... The video playing experience is just awful.
- supuun 6y agoYeah, video playback sucks both on desktop and mobile websites
- shpongled 6y agoIf I was forced to use new reddit rather than old reddit I would probably never visit the site again. I can't stand the new version.
- IncRnd 6y agoYou can always go to old.reddit.com to use the older reddit interface.
- Andrew_nenakhov 6y agoOnly until they inevitably turn it off
- tootahe45 6y ago50% of the functionality also doesn't even work on Firefox in my experience.
- kdtsh 6y agoSeeing as new reddit feels like new Google as far as UI elements are concerned, I’m not surprised - it’s made for Chrome.
- nichos 6y agoI didn't use reddit much anymore, since it's mostly a cesspool of politics, but if I have to, this plugin is very useful: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/old-reddit-redirect/ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/old-reddit-re...
- jabl 6y agoI just found this one. It's awesome! Also, on mobile it gets rid of this "switch to the native app" nag!
- sbmthakur 6y agoI joined Reddit when the new UI was the default. I was relieved when I discovered old.reddit.com and i.reddit.com. I use them on PC and mobile respectively.
- throwaway_pdp09 6y ago> the UI is a breath of fresh air compared to new Reddit I agree. I find this interface extremely readable (It clearly displays "JavaScript is required for this page") and simple to use; I close it and move on to something that actually works. Very minimal and intuitive. I approve.