I also noticed that sentence. Circular reasoning out in the open. I don't personally see over-alarmist info as being as prevalent or as effective as denialist

I also noticed that sentence. Circular reasoning out in the open. I don't personally see over-alarmist info as being as prevalent or as effective as denialist info, in large part because simply prudently-alarmist info in line with scientific predictions has enough trouble getting traction, this was not the way to rationalize an exclusion of that topic from the article.