> isn't remotely as bad as it used to be, so it's not accurate to characterize it as a "descent". What a "so". There's simultaneously so much confidence and so

> isn't remotely as bad as it used to be, so it's not accurate to characterize it as a "descent". What a "so". There's simultaneously so much confidence and so much innumeracy packed into it. It's impressive how much a mere two letters can communicate.