4 ms·
No, the stalker is presenting outright untrue and misleading information is an encyclopedic context to give it an air of legitimacy. It's all sourced to his own
by Acrobatic_Road 6y ago
No, the stalker is presenting outright untrue and misleading information is an encyclopedic context to give it an air of legitimacy. It's all sourced to his own blog. There's a reason Wikipedia doesn't allow blogs as sources.
Among the lies, is a quote attributed to Josh that someone added to his Encyclopedia Dramatica page, which the person later removed with the reason: ""sorry, I made this up".
- joshuamorton 6y agoNone of the sources on Wikipedia are blogs. None are attributed to this guy you keep bringing up. You're claims are false, please don't peddle falsehoods. Are you arguing that the central claim: that kiwi farms doxxes and harasses people is untrue?
- Acrobatic_Road 6y agoYou mentioned "kiwi farms wiki page" which I took to mean the Kiwi Farms Wiki, which is the second result when I google the name Joshua Moon. http://www.kiwifarmswiki.com/index.php?title=Joshua_Conner_Moon http://www.kiwifarmswiki.com/index.php?title=Joshua_Conner_M... This is the self-referential page created by the stalker in order to defame Josh. I am not referring to the Wikipedia page on Kiwi Farms.
- joshuamorton 6y agoI was referring to the Wikipedia page.
- throwaway983457 6y agoWell, here is some information on Mr Moon that is not from Wikipedia, and is not coming from "the stalker": https://www.smh.com.au/world/oceania/owner-of-christchurch-shooting-linked-website-calls-nz-a-s-hole-country-20190319-p515e6.html https://www.smh.com.au/world/oceania/owner-of-christchurch-s...
- Acrobatic_Road 6y agoPeople shouldn't be canceled for opposing internet censorship.