5 ms·
I really can't believe we're still talking about this. He could easily have moved past what he did by making a short statement and a donation to an LGBTQ+-frie
by dogecoinbase 6y ago
I really can't believe we're still talking about this. He could easily have moved past what he did by making a short statement and a donation to an LGBTQ+-friendly cause. Instead, he was apparently completely unprepared for something that had been brought up internally at Moz many times and made a blundery, offensive non-response. That is what was disqualifying for the position of CEO.
- apta 6y ago> He could easily have moved past what he did by making a short statement and a donation What if he still doesn't agree with homosexual marriage? Who are you to force him to change his view?
- dogecoinbase 6y agoThat is not a counterargument to me -- I simply explained one of many ways that he could easily have kept the job (the easiest would have not to have been a bigot in the first place, but hey). It's that he had no communication plan for an easily-foreseeable controversy that was disqualifying, not his views specifically.
- apta 6y agoSo conform to group think or lose your job. If he doesn't believe in homosexuality, he's a bigot and deserves to lose his job. Got it.