why conceive of it as a problem? heterogeneity of thought and view lends more engaging and interesting conversations, new learnings and perspectives, and a more

why conceive of it as a problem? heterogeneity of thought and view lends more engaging and interesting conversations, new learnings and perspectives, and a more resilient and innovative society to boot, even if it's more of a challenge. it's surely better that you have to work at a conversation than have some bland homogeneity of thought for faux-comfort bubbles. comfort is entirely orthogonal to journalism anyway. it's purpose is to (mis-)inform, not to entertain and provide bonding fodder. you have plenty of other, better (media) avenues for that (movies, tv, etc).