5 ms·
Yeah, that's a bit glib. A lot of the joints and seams technology in Peruvian ruins is unexplainable - even with modern industrial processes, we would be very
by fit2rule 6y ago
Yeah, that's a bit glib. A lot of the joints and seams technology in Peruvian ruins is unexplainable - even with modern industrial processes, we would be very hard pressed to replicate the results of some of these structures. Like it'd be very, very hard to do it as well as the ancients did, even with our crazy construction technology...
- brutt 6y agoIt's concrete.
- naasking 6y agoThat doesn't solve the problem. Concrete forms in a mold. Now you have to explain how the mold was made so flat.
- dredmorbius 6y agoBang, er, well, grind three rocks together. http://precisiongranitecn.com/info/how-to-make-granite-surface-plate-22832971.html http://precisiongranitecn.com/info/how-to-make-granite-surfa...
- ncmncm 6y agoSo, they made a unique, precision rock mold, exactly one for each unique, poured-concrete megalith, and then... turned the mold into more concrete, and poured that into another unique, laboriously constructed rock mold? Color me not satisfied with this picture.
- dredmorbius 6y agoI'm not saying that's what the Inca did. But it's how you arrive at a microscopically flat surface plate.
- brutt 6y agoWhy rock? Mold can be made from wood, animal skin, clay, or just dug hole in earth.
- brutt 6y agoMold is made from animal skin (waterproof) and wood, then block is cast in place. Skin degraded with time, so nothing left between blocks. It's easy to notice bumps on blocks where animal legs were.
- fit2rule 6y agoYeah, no. Its basaltic and granite blocks, literally cut with micro-mm precision, and glued together in a fashion that prevents seam gaps. These seams, in some cases, are thousands of years old .. And then, there are the fused-rock glasses found on some monuments which defy explanation. Lightning? Perhaps, but then there's that corona eruption theory .. Someone was melting rocks. Maybe with microwave resolutions.
- brutt 6y agoCan you point to the source? Last time I checked it, it was concrete. Forms for blocks are made from animal skins. Cement was made in kiln. At least one kiln has pretty modern look.
- fit2rule 6y agoLook, there are all sorts of schools of thought on how these things were built, but none of them were conclusive. I'm not saying it was rock-melting alien technology, but it was clearly some form of advanced technology we are unable to duplicate or conceive was available to the builders. Here's where to go to get on the Graham Hancock/Randall Carlson train, in case you haven't seen it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDejwCGdUV8&t=1s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDejwCGdUV8&t=1s Some interesting observations which are counter to the narrative: https://www.ancient-origins.net/ancient-places-americas/unravelling-mystery-behind-megalithic-stone-walls-saksaywaman-001470 https://www.ancient-origins.net/ancient-places-americas/unra...
- pakitan 6y agoWell, given a choice between the 2 hypotheses: 1. Lots of people with lots of time on their hands did something that we'd be currently hard pressed to do but no one has really tried yet. OR 2. Two aliens land on Earth and one of them says "Hey, how do we help out these poor savages to advance their civilization? I know, we'll teach them to build really cool walls from stone!" ...I know which one I'll pick. The wiki article doesn't offer any suspicions of extraterrestrial origin. In fact, a contemporary account suggests it's just hard work: "to save themselves the expense, effort and delay with which the Indians worked the stone, they pulled down all the smooth masonry in the walls. There is indeed not a house in the city that has not been made of this stone, or at least the houses built by the Spaniards." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacsayhuam%C3%A1n https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacsayhuam%C3%A1n EDIT: Do you have a reference for the 0.005mm precision claim? Some of those walls look impressive but the pictures I'm looking at, definitely don't suggest such God-like precision: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacsayhuam%C3%A1n#/media/File:Sacsayhuam%C3%A1n,_Cusco,_Per%C3%BA,_2015-07-31,_DD_27.JPG https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacsayhuam%C3%A1n#/media/File:... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacsayhuam%C3%A1n#/media/File:Sacsayhuam%C3%A1n,_Cusco,_Per%C3%BA,_2015-07-31,_DD_21.JPG https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacsayhuam%C3%A1n#/media/File:...
- RikNieu 6y agoOr 3, some ancient people had better construction technology than we give them credit for. No need to bring up aliens every time someone questions orthodoxy.
- fit2rule 6y agoYes, there are many theories that can be entertained. My favourite is the mythos that, over a hundred thousand years, perhaps humans did evolve to the point they had technology to leave the planet, tidying up after themselves as they did, and its just us stragglers left behind that have been slowly devolving the tools they also left behind .. 'what if' doesn't have to be disregarded, just because its preposterous. I mean, I never once mentioned two aliens in a UFO, but hey .. sure, why not.
- sergeykish 6y ago