2 ms·

The best part about the article is so many references.

• mhh__ 6y ago
  What proportion of the recent ones have seen peer review? I saw a lot of *xivs
  • Thorrez 6y ago
    These 5 from 2020 all seem to be peer reviewed. I'm no expert though. > (Zhou et al., 2020; Wrapp et al., 2020; Wan et al., 2020; Walls et al., 2020; Letko et al., 2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb2507 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb2507 https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00127-20 https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00127-20 https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.19.956581 https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.19.956581 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-020-0688-y https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-020-0688-y
    • stepstop 6y ago
      Does peer review still hold significant stature? It’s been discussed many times here how limited it is. I’m sad about it
• learnstats2 6y ago
  It references a bunch of papers that are irrelevant to its central point in an attempt to appear scientific.