4 ms·
They don’t mention hospitalization or deaths. Those are the two to keep track of. I’m guessing far more people are getting tested than previously, hence the lar
by vondur 6y ago
They don’t mention hospitalization or deaths. Those are the two to keep track of. I’m guessing far more people are getting tested than previously, hence the larger numbers.
- troydavis 6y ago> I’m guessing far more people are getting tested than previously, hence the larger numbers. Nationally that may be a contributing factor, but in hotspot states, the % of tests which are positive has actually gone up significantly: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/testing/individual-states https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/testing/individual-states and select Florida or Arizona
- ketanmaheshwari 6y agoThe deaths are increasing too. 2500+ people passed away yesterday (June 25) in the US.
- fullshark 6y agoFrom all causes? Covid number is lower https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/ https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/
- Marsymars 6y agoThat can't be from all causes, there are around 8,000 deaths per day in the US from all causes.
- averros 6y agoThe deaths ATTRIBUTED to COVID-19. Not necessarily deaths FROM it. The difference is huge, as vast majority of people reported as died from COVID-19 were, in fact, seriously ill already, so the viral infection was a minor factor (or a last straw). Considering that hospitals have financial incentives to attribute deaths to COVID-19 thanks to the government largesse, it is not surprising that all these ambiguous cases are reported as COVID-19 deaths now. For all other illnesses the standards for reporting are quite different.
- msbarnett 6y agoThe % of tests that are coming back positive is increasing, which is a good indication that the growth we're seeing is due to a growth in infections, and not just growth in testing
- mikedilger 6y agoThose are immune to the sampling rate bias, but they are lagging indicators. Based on the recent widespread failures to socially distance (e.g. George Floyd protests, campaign rallys, etc), I suspect those lagging charts will start trending upwards. You can also correct for the sampling rate bias by looking at the number of cases per 100,000 tests (or similar). Does anyone have a link tracking that? EDIT: percentage positive tests: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/testing/individual-states https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/testing/individual-states
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- danaliv 6y agoAreas with BLM actions have not seen an increase in rates of infection. https://www.popsci.com/story/health/black-lives-matter-protests-covid-19-transmission/ https://www.popsci.com/story/health/black-lives-matter-prote...
- AnimalMuppet 6y agoThat seems... very suspicious. I doubt that the virus cares what the reason for a large gathering is. I don't think the BLM actions were using proper social distancing. But what does that leave? People who went haven't bothered to get tested since? Everybody wore masks, and that's way more effective than we thought? The gatherings were outside, and the Vitamin D is saving everyone?
- derbOac 6y agoThere have been epi efforts to oversample people in the blm protests specifically to examine its impact on infection rates and find it didn't matter. They didn't have an explanation but suspected it had to do with the protests mostly being outdoors.
- amanaplanacanal 6y ago
- hcknwscommenter 6y agoIt took me 10 minutes to get over my shock at your comment. Information entirely refuting your "guess" that the larger numbers are due to more people being tested is available at your fingertips. It takes about a second to google, click and read this information. I think you may be the victim of propaganda. You would do well to rethink your information sources and implicit biases.
- playingchanges 6y agoDaily covid hospitalizations have doubled over the past month in Texas. https://www.tmc.edu/coronavirus-updates/tmc-daily-new-covid-19-hospitalizations/ https://www.tmc.edu/coronavirus-updates/tmc-daily-new-covid-...