In addition to my sibling comment, I would like to add: > since no one will use jpeg at a point where its falling apart. Hence we also put it at bitrates peop

In addition to my sibling comment, I would like to add: > since no one will use jpeg at a point where its falling apart. Hence we also put it at bitrates people actually use :) And then the point should be that HiFiC uses much fewer bits. > below-knee for HiFiC We actually did not train lower than this model, HiFiC^lo. That it works so well was somewhat surprising to us also! From other GAN literature, it seems reasonable to expect the "below-knee" point for this kind of approach to still look realistic, but not faithful anymore. I.e., without the original, it may be hard to tell that it's fake.