> While it's indeed possible that there are ambiguous cases, that doesn't invalidate the idea in general. Compared to you vs the US president, I'd say all case

> While it's indeed possible that there are ambiguous cases, that doesn't invalidate the idea in general. Compared to you vs the US president, I'd say all cases are ambiguous. Are we just measuring the president and then say "that's what the people in power believe", or are we determining everyone's power level and opinions and then weigh both to find out what part of those in power believe X? It's impossible to do accurately, and you won't get a binary picture even if you managed to do it.