I didn't intend to come off so oppositional. I agreed with what you were saying, just was trying to add more in agreement. >A (large company) CEO has the wealt

I didn't intend to come off so oppositional. I agreed with what you were saying, just was trying to add more in agreement. >A (large company) CEO has the wealth to give them the freedom to not be an employee. Yes but I didn't read that as "giving him his time back", I read that as "could be a manager, start a new company" etc. I thought your post was excellent, apologies for misunderstandings. Cheers!