3 ms·
You know you're comparing people fully armed and cautious people versus the general population, right? Also it's a biased comparison because the 2,116 could hav
by rabanne 6y ago
You know you're comparing people fully armed and cautious people versus the general population, right? Also it's a biased comparison because the 2,116 could have been shot where the rate of "could have been shot" is much lower in the general public because obvious reasons.
- rrss 6y agoYou know that you failed to understand your own source and therefore claimed a number of officer shootings ~16x higher than reality, right? And 'sacred_numbers was kind enough to correct you?