The whole idea of recommendation systems is based on the assumption that you're gonna keep doing the samething over. Its accuracy is depending on whether you ar

The whole idea of recommendation systems is based on the assumption that you're gonna keep doing the samething over. Its accuracy is depending on whether you are a person of habbits or constantly changing. While in some aspects having a pattern is good (work or routine life tasks), in many others it's an indication of something unhealthy or not optimal. You don't want to be that person that seems to have a limited vocab and just keep using the same phares. You also most likely dont want to keep buying the same stuff or reading just that one particular genre/author/news outlet. Autocomplete particularly never worked to me and I'm happy that I cant seem to be typecasted by a machine. As a software developer, I wonder what the people who made these engines think. Are they actually happy that their code makes people more predictable?