3 ms·
Of course it helps to have a gun if your opponent has a gun, because both of you now have a risk of getting shot. If I know you don't have a gun because you're
by gridlockd 6y ago
Of course it helps to have a gun if your opponent has a gun, because both of you now have a risk of getting shot.
If I know you don't have a gun because you're one of these unarmed cops, I can completely dominate the situation. I can make you stand on one leg and do a recital.
> By analogy, people are allowed to own rocket launchers as well (it's true!) but that doesn't mean every beat cop should carry one.
Rocket launchers are not anti-personnel weapons and no ordinary criminal carries them or would be expected to carry them. The best weapon to neutralize a threat wielding a rocket launcher is not another rocket launcher, it's a rifle.
Should we arrive at the situation where criminals routinely arrive in armored personnel carriers or tanks, then we can talk about arming the police with rocket launchers.
- sukilot 6y agoRight, so police need body armor, not handguns.
- gridlockd 6y agoBody armor might save your life, but it doesn't make you invincible to bullets. If you take a bullet with body armor, you're going down. You're no threat whatsoever. You have no power in the situation, you can't get it under control, mitigate the threat, and so on.