3 ms·
Don't get me wrong - I really do love Haskell. And I don't think the language extensions are bad. I just mean that Haskell doesn't feel like a coherent, commer
by nvarsj 6y ago
Don't get me wrong - I really do love Haskell. And I don't think the language extensions are bad.
I just mean that Haskell doesn't feel like a coherent, commercial language to me. It is basically a bunch of PhD thesis's strung together on top of a research language - with some of these being very interesting and incredibly useful. This is perfectly fine for what it is - but it also means the overall language and standard library have not been designed with a "batteries included" mentality that let people get going easily and quickly in a commercial setting.
I suggested CL/Clojure because those are both interesting, lambda-calculus based languages similar to Haskell (without the typing, unfortunately), with great, mature libraries for building any commercial project possible.
- platz 6y agoNo, I agree Haskell is not a "batteries included" language. That said, a lot new of languages tend to opt for a minimal base footprint e.g. rust, so that has also been the trend lately.