3 ms·
Hi! One of the authors here. Thank you for the exposure and feedback! We really appreciate it. About the code. We have added comments and simple running examp
by hilles 6y ago
Hi! One of the authors here.
Thank you for the exposure and feedback! We really appreciate it.
About the code. We have added comments and simple running examples to the code on github. Hopefully that helps make the code more accessible to everyone.
About the contribution. Classic numerical inverse Laplace
transformation methods work in some cases but fail in others, while the CME method always gives a good approximation at low computational cost. We recommend it for general use when you just want to invert a
function numerically without spending effort to figure out what methods might be applicable.
- no_identd 6y agoThis story is six days old. Don't expect a lot of replies to your comment to come, but know that your comment & more importantly the improvements (and ofc the result!) get appreciated.