2 ms·
Correct, but this requires miner collusion. If just one miner says no (or isn't contactable by the colluding party) then the transaction can make it into a bloc
by Acrobatic_Road 6y ago
Correct, but this requires miner collusion. If just one miner says no (or isn't contactable by the colluding party) then the transaction can make it into a block.
If this ever became a practical issue, which I doubt, then censored people would only need to switch to any coin that supports stealth addresses.
Edit: I also suppose, the colluding miners could also try to mine a competing fork to censor a block. This would be rightfully called out as a 51% attack attempt, though.