5 ms·
As I understand it, Microsoft Defender may not be open source, so you have to trust that what you're running really is Microsoft Defender and that it's behaving
by jka 6y ago
As I understand it, Microsoft Defender may not be open source, so you have to trust that what you're running really is Microsoft Defender and that it's behaving correctly.
Given that, a possible upside with ClamAV could be that you could verify the behaviour of the processes on the installed systems, to make sure you're up-to-date and have the correct software and signatures installed.
That's not unreasonable - Microsoft's software delivery pipeline should be trustworthy and their security reputation could be damaged if an issue were discovered here.
- acdha 6y ago> Microsoft Defender may not be open source, so you have to trust that what you're running really is Microsoft Defender and that it's behaving correctly. That’s true of everything installed on a system - if you don’t control the software you’re running, Defender is the least of your worries. Unless you’re doing a full analysis of every binary you’re trusting the source.