3 ms·
Unless I'm missing something, this map might be pretty or impressive that it can be made, but it is entirely meaningless. Meaningless in that I don't know of si
by angleofrepose 6y ago
Unless I'm missing something, this map might be pretty or impressive that it can be made, but it is entirely meaningless. Meaningless in that I don't know of significant meaning of breaking down the globe into 10° chunks whatsoever. This doesn't tell you anything about the cities shown, nor the area in which those cities exist. There is zero meaning in this map because no meaning can be derived from the filter process. The constraints have no relation to the data.
The article is cool that it takes a dive into the "odder" boxes and finds a flaw or two. The author also recognizes the arbitrary nature of the map. I imagine that almost any other filtering would be more interesting to geek out over though.
I am somewhat surprised by the popularity of this post here and on reddit, but then again that is sometimes how popularity works. The piece is presented well, just meaningless.
- mjd 6y agoNot everything needs to have utility. Some things are just for fun. Utility is important, but fun is important too.
- angleofrepose 6y agoThat's a fair point I respect. It does seem that it would be easy to have this fun in a way which is also useful, with literally any filtering system which had a relationship to the data. Equal work, equal fun, more than zero use.
- autokad 6y agoits an interesting problem. for the longest time, openstreetmap hid Philadelphia pretty much until you got down to the rooftop level and it annoyed the crap out of me. Its still not very good at what cities to show; Its a hard problem and I appreciate the article shining light on this issue.