>the concept of having an absolutely applicable in all circumstances free speech right is not a concept used everywhere. It is as a moral concept. I'd argue (a

>the concept of having an absolutely applicable in all circumstances free speech right is not a concept used everywhere. It is as a moral concept. I'd argue (as a Canadian) the Canadian legal concept of "free speech" doesn't really resemble the moral concept at all. Which is shameful. Unobjectionable conduct doesn't need protection.