4 ms·
It’s a common talking point people use to obfuscate and defend wikileaks. As you note, it’s irrelevant but also, if true, illustrates how selectively showing t
by mint2 6y ago
It’s a common talking point people use to obfuscate and defend wikileaks.
As you note, it’s irrelevant but also, if true, illustrates how selectively showing true info is deceptive.
- travmatt 6y agoThe better question is whether he’s buried true facts in order to help public figures. There’s strong evidence he’s censored whistleblowers leaking damaging documents about Russia involvement in syria[0], along with his pretty open partnership with the Russian government. [0]https://www.theverge.com/platform/amp/2016/9/9/12864328/wikileaks-threat-reporters-syria-russia-emails https://www.theverge.com/platform/amp/2016/9/9/12864328/wiki...