> Plot twist: Scott's real name has been easily findable for at least a year, based on his own words. So I don't understand why he went full nuclear. He pointe

> Plot twist: Scott's real name has been easily findable for at least a year, based on his own words. So I don't understand why he went full nuclear. He pointed out that there’s a difference between googleable by looking up someone’s words, where you have to do a bit of work to find it, and it being published in the NYT. > It's also an assumption by everybody that the NYT article was going to be a hit piece, even though there's no evidence of that whatsoever. Is that the assumption? Again, going by his words (as well as others who were interviewed for it) it was going to be a generally very positive article.