3 ms·
What I consider beta is: - the Apple Watch 1 and iPhone 1 didn't have real apps (at least until the second year/generation) - the physical design of iPhone 1/
by gregoriol 6y ago
What I consider beta is:
- the Apple Watch 1 and iPhone 1 didn't have real apps (at least until the second year/generation)
- the physical design of iPhone 1/iPad 1/Apple Watch 1 was changed with the second generation
- the Core Duo MacBooks were the only Intel non-64 bit devices
and there probably are quite a few other examples
So as far as I am concerned, the first Apple CPU in a mac will be a no-go beta device, that will be much better at the second generation.
Also, regarding the OS, we are not really yet aware of all the things that are going to break with the architecture change: it's not a switch to ARM but a switch to Apple. There's a huge lot of possible problems for a device I'll need running at 100% for my work.
- fabioyy 6y agoagreed, every "new" implementation of apple hardware is cursed with bugs list of recalls: https://support.apple.com/en-asia/exchange_repair https://support.apple.com/en-asia/exchange_repair and there is a lot of bugs that apple don't even admit. (ex, ghosting screen on some macbookpro retina ( first version )