5 ms·
Eons ago when Google started aggregating news they greatly damaged the news industry. This is because you could start seeing the bigger story and the bias in th
by sleepysysadmin 6y ago
Eons ago when Google started aggregating news they greatly damaged the news industry. This is because you could start seeing the bigger story and the bias in the individual reporting. This was damaging to Fox News obviously.
It got worse unfortunately, the journalists were caught faking scenes. https://money.cnn.com/2016/11/04/media/abc-news-stage-live-shot/index.html?sr=twCNN110416abc-news-stage-live-shot0715PMStoryLink&linkId=30720260 https://money.cnn.com/2016/11/04/media/abc-news-stage-live-s...
Then the fake news was discovered: https://i.imgur.com/plF3WDu.jpg https://i.imgur.com/plF3WDu.jpg
Same newspaper, same story, contradictory reporting. Obviously this was done for different places.
People started discovering that news is heavily fake. Why buy something when they are outright lying to you? This is the reason the news industry is dying.
- 8organicbits 6y ago> Then the fake news was discovered: https://i.imgur.com/plF3WDu.jpg https://i.imgur.com/plF3WDu.jpg > Same newspaper, same story, contradictory reporting. Obviously this was done for different places. I believe you are misinformed. A couple searches on the headlines tells a different story. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/wsj-different-trump-headlines/ https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/wsj-different-trump-headli... > Yes, the images represent two different editions, published at different times, and the headlines represent the news at the time of publication — before and after his speech. https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-wall-street-journal-headlin-idUSKBN23V22J https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-wall-street-jou... > While the two covers are both authentic, they were published at different times on that day to reflect evolving developments.