4 ms·
From what I understand, your issue is with the amount they plan to charge, not the fact that they will be charging? That seems like a reasonable place to have
by jaysonelliot 16y ago
From what I understand, your issue is with the amount they plan to charge, not the fact that they will be charging?
That seems like a reasonable place to have a discussion, rather that people who just think everything which once cost money should now be free.
- high5ths 16y agoYes, I believe the Times generates more than enough content to warrant paying -- I look at the last few years as probably some lucky free-period that should have ended a while ago. I just think their plans are misguided and overpriced. In the meantime, though, I got an email from Lincoln offering me free Times access through the end of 2011[1]. So at least I won't have to think too hard about it for another 8 months. [1] See http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704461304576216770555617038.html http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405274870446130457621... for details.