2 ms·
Sadly, no. A lot of the available 'nice' containers require host access that isn't available on Fargate. The ones people tend to use on Fargate are pure user-sp
by oneplane 6y ago
Sadly, no. A lot of the available 'nice' containers require host access that isn't available on Fargate. The ones people tend to use on Fargate are pure user-space versions that don't work as well as others. We have evaluated a bunch of finds from blogs and public repositories but they all lack one way or another.
Most of our setups use OpenVPN via OpnSense on AWS, second most popular option is OpenVPN-AS with a paid license, third is AWS OpenVPN, because of the price tag.
A few test setups rely on a small EC2 instance per group (t3.small for example) with a single container and it's a bit quirky to automate, especially on large user groups.
This is our main issue with WG in production so far: while the technology seems totally fine, it's not at a point where you can smoothly roll out a 'service' and get going, there are too many hoops to jump through and too many duct-tape constructions to make it integrate. (somewhat ironic, considering OpenVPN)