3 ms·
You can certainly argue that the individuals are just doing their jobs and are not political actors per se, but they are definitely working towards the goals of
by dvtrn 6y ago
You can certainly argue that the individuals are just doing their jobs and are not political actors per se, but they are definitely working towards the goals of politically driven organizations.
I get this point, and I can't say I necessarily disagree with it, it just feels like the usual kvetching against "the media" which is such a broad and generalized gripe (even when it is sometimes specifically valid if we could point to specific instances of just terrible coverage of current event n) it feels kind of meaningless?
Like I said, I don't even really disagree it's just: what does one do with such a large and wide-reaching indictment of "the press"? I like solution oriented thinking, but I suppose that's more of a rhetorical question than anything else.
- zepto 6y agoI think we fundamentally agree. Kvetching about the press is largely meaningless. My position is that it’s meaningless because of the illusion that the press could be something that it is not, and that we would be better off if we just treated be it as what it is.
- dvtrn 6y agoHm. Yeah, I think we're very much aligned on this, if maybe for different but not necessarily competing reasons. Cheers