Seeing the same results on my end for that query. I'm a little puzzled, when I use the same query but with != instead of = to produce a 1.6 trillion row result,

Seeing the same results on my end for that query. I'm a little puzzled, when I use the same query but with != instead of = to produce a 1.6 trillion row result, it's about 3-4ms execution. I don't know why it's taking 10,000x longer using = instead of !=. Something about how timestamp comparisons are handled?