> Maybe it’s unclear to policy makers, too. I think rather than it being "unclear" to policy makers, it's rather that there's a short-term economic imperative

> Maybe it’s unclear to policy makers, too. I think rather than it being "unclear" to policy makers, it's rather that there's a short-term economic imperative to go for 3), or if not, then 2), while 1) upfronts economic cost. This means that while the general desire might be to go for 1) from an ethical/expert/academic-advice perspective, policy makers are doing their best to hedge (while not wanting to appear as if they are).