> Every time I run an image comparison, the webp version looks worse and yet Google insists it's the same quality. It's baffling. Could you share your comparis

> Every time I run an image comparison, the webp version looks worse and yet Google insists it's the same quality. It's baffling. Could you share your comparisons? From the ones I've seen, it looks like WebP significantly outperforms JPEG encoders[0]. [0]: https://wyohknott.github.io/image-formats-comparison/#endeavour-with-columbia*3:1&jpg=s&webp=s https://wyohknott.github.io/image-formats-comparison/#endeav...