3 ms·
Because none of the things besides acquisition is anti-competitive in the context of anti-trust law. Facebook doesn’t owe competitors their data. It’s absurd t
by alexmingoia 6y ago
Because none of the things besides acquisition is anti-competitive in the context of anti-trust law.
Facebook doesn’t owe competitors their data. It’s absurd to construe not actively helping competitors by giving them your data as “anti-competitive.”
- boomboomsubban 6y ago>Because none of the things besides acquisition is anti-competitive in the context of anti-trust law. Have you read antitrust law? The Sherman Act is vague enough that anything that could be considered anticompetitive would violate the law. The "Rule of Reason." > It’s absurd to construe not actively helping competitors by giving them your data as “anti-competitive.” Publicly agreeing to an agreement allowing something and then changing the terms to control how competitive they can be is.