3 ms·
It's a good service, but I think the GP's point is that it's not trivial to do. Lots of websites probably went down because they missed that e-mail and we've s
by treis 6y ago
It's a good service, but I think the GP's point is that it's not trivial to do. Lots of websites probably went down because they missed that e-mail and we've seen lots of major websites go down due to some issue related to their certificate.
Let's Encrypt has lowered the bar, but it's still a bar that needs to be overcome.
- tialaramex 6y agoAs we'd expect ISRG not only fixed the immediate problem they also accelerated plans to ensure that any similar problem would have less serious ill effects. In particular a current Certbot (or similar software from other developers) will conclude that it should try to replace a certificate which has been revoked and not only certificates that will shortly expire. So if a similar event happened, and you missed the email, your Certbot will treat the certificates much as if they'd expired and replace them automatically. Also if you didn't replace a revoked certificate the thing is: Online revocation is broken. Most of your users will not have noticed your certificate was revoked. Popular browsers do have an out-of-band way to enforce revocation but they didn't use it on that Let's Encrypt incident because they felt it was low risk. So maybe some people are running Internet Explorer (really?) or have explicitly turned on revocation, everybody else doesn't even see a warning page.