3 ms·
So, I made two claims in the original (and unedited) comment that spawned this thread: 1) The weaker one, about link finding 2) and furthermore a stronger one
by scarmig 6y ago
So, I made two claims in the original (and unedited) comment that spawned this thread:
1) The weaker one, about link finding
2) and furthermore a stronger one, which I quote in my response.
The stronger one being, "you need at most middling Google-fu to find his real name from his pseudonym if you're motivated."
That stronger claim is still weaker than your "his real name is immediately available to anyone who knows the name Scott Alexander." That said, perhaps we have different thresholds for immediate: mine was spending ~60 seconds searching for his pseudonym and trying to find his real name from it, and I failed to find it. I think it's likely I could within 10 minutes, but I'd put that clearly in the territory of my intermediate claim.
- tptacek 6y agoI'm lost. Anyways: the Google searches have nothing to do with already knowing Scott Alexander's real name.
- KirinDave 6y agoGo do a firstname lastname search for Scott and then look what shows up on page 1. I regret to inform you he cannot escape his reactionary blog just by wishing it so. If anything, this escapade will draw more attention to him. The NYT is not required