5 ms·
Can you change it back? The justice.gov link is much newer and contains significant new information. For example, the Reuters article emphasizes that the defend
by zenexer 6y ago
Can you change it back? The justice.gov link is much newer and contains significant new information. For example, the Reuters article emphasizes that the defendant was not yet guilty and a second person hadn’t yet been charged. However, the justice.gov link says both are now defendants, and both pleaded guilty.
Edit: This is already causing confusion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23622823 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23622823 Flagging for your attention.
- dang 6y agoOk, I've changed it back from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-otc-masstorts/doj-charges-roundup-plaintiffs-lawyer-in-200-million-alleged-extortion-scheme-idUSKBN1YM2L9 https://www.reuters.com/article/us-otc-masstorts/doj-charges.... That was from Dec 2019 while the OP is from June 2020. Sorry!