4 ms·
Also fun to go back to a much earlier version: https://web.archive.org/web/20130807124247/https://github.com/torvalds/linux https://web.archive.org/web/2013080
by treve 6y ago
Also fun to go back to a much earlier version:
https://web.archive.org/web/20130807124247/https://github.com/torvalds/linux https://web.archive.org/web/20130807124247/https://github.co...
- granzymes 6y agoHah. I think we can all agree that the UI has been improved since then.
- nfoz 6y agoI....... have to disagree, though I'm not sure why, but that old one looks much better to me. Like it's simpler and more clear.
- jolmg 6y agoThe sidebar it had seems to waste too much space, though. It's just 5 links meant for navigation. They'd be better arranged horizontally. I can agree that it's clearer than what we had a few days ago, having only 1 navbar instead of 2, but that's also because it has a lot less features than GitHub has now.
- granzymes 6y agoThe 2013 version by comparison wastes horizontal space while surfacing less information. The contrast is worse and there isn't enough to visually distinguish the four (!) rows of headers. Personally, I also find the navigation box on the right to be weirdly sunken into the page and I think the color scheme has been greatly improved.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- simonw 6y agoAnd even earlier: https://web.archive.org/web/20090927132251/http://github.com:80/django/django https://web.archive.org/web/20090927132251/http://github.com...
- lostmsu 6y agoWow, that one looks like a SourceForge clone.
- gitgud 6y agoMy favorite version of Github, is 2017... buttons looked like buttons and simplicity was embraced https://web.archive.org/web/20170924075025/https://github.com/torvalds/linux https://web.archive.org/web/20170924075025/https://github.co...