3 ms·
I'm completely neutral. They've changed their UI many times over the years and this is no different. Products usually change UI and that's just a fact of life.
by phillipcarter 6y ago
I'm completely neutral. They've changed their UI many times over the years and this is no different. Products usually change UI and that's just a fact of life.
- verdverm 6y agoThis is different because there was a major change to where (formerly header) information is displayed now on the side. The top-level hierarchy is different and causes much more wasted space
- phillipcarter 6y agoHonestly, I don't care about any of these things. UIs change and I just have to deal with it.
- threeseed 6y agoI will never understand people who take the time and effort to post comments saying "I don't care".
- gruez 6y ago>They've changed their UI many times over the years and this is no different. Products usually change UI and that's just a fact of life. Your justification for bad redesigns is that... other companies do it too? That's a very apathetic/defeatist attitude.
- dntrkv 6y agoMost of the time it isn't bad UI but a vocal minority that just hates any change. It's not like these companies release these changes without doing significant user testing and AB testing. If you design based on the opinions of HN/Twitter, every site would look like Craigslist (or HN's favorite abomination of a design, the Berkshire Hathaway site).