4 ms·
What do you mean with 'new physics'? And no, the higgs was a theory, now proven right (maybe you mean that by 'new physics'?) Sorry but your view on the world
by nix23 6y ago
What do you mean with 'new physics'?
And no, the higgs was a theory, now proven right (maybe you mean that by 'new physics'?)
Sorry but your view on the world is just depressing, its like we need 'new science' 'new physics' whatever that means, but building the experiment to proof a theory is right, is too expensive?
And no the JWST is a space telescope NOT something completely different from hubble, it's a telescope.
- HPsquared 6y agoI'm not the OP, but the thing that's depressing to me is putting so many of our resources into basically a repeat of what was already done, but slightly bigger and with no expectation of finding anything significant. I mean, are we out of ideas?
- nix23 6y ago23B is NOT 'many' resources, and this is why they do it: SOURCE https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-00173-2 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-00173-2
- cartoonfoxes 6y agoJWST covers different wavelengths than Hubble, which is a meaningful difference as far as telescopes go. The proposed LUVOIR or HABEX telescopes would be the successors to Hubble.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]