2 ms·
That sounds good; thanks for the response. Most stuff I do is in the middle between static/dynamic; needs solid SEO and prerendered parts for various reasons bu
by tluyben2 6y ago
That sounds good; thanks for the response. Most stuff I do is in the middle between static/dynamic; needs solid SEO and prerendered parts for various reasons but also contains, for browsers that support it, quite a lot of dynamic elements. Now we just use asp.net/static-with-some-react but that is driving me bonkers.
- dgb23 6y agoStatic with some react sounds like a nightmare. One of the primary reasons why many moved to JS frameworks was to have a better separation of concerns and a single place where GUI logic resides. May I suggest you have a look at Next.js. It lets you solve this in a very ergonomic way. Maybe even for your existing project.
- tluyben2 6y agoYeah it is a nightmare; it is not my choice. It is the same ‘everyone uses it so we need as well’ type of thing thrown in by partners. Thanks for Next.js: I did not know it.