> Why do you think a system that doesn't make it difficult to completely destroy it with one command is a bad idea? This does not seem very charitable. It is

> Why do you think a system that doesn't make it difficult to completely destroy it with one command is a bad idea? This does not seem very charitable. It is fine if the system warns you about doing potentially dangerous operations (which --no-preserve-root amounts to) but it must not prevent you from ignoring that warning.