3 ms·
It's Fox News for psuedo-intellectuals. My mother is a subscriber so I read a bit and it is absolutely atrociously biased and blatantly misleading in a similar
by rorykoehler 6y ago
It's Fox News for psuedo-intellectuals. My mother is a subscriber so I read a bit and it is absolutely atrociously biased and blatantly misleading in a similar way to how Fox News operate. The main difference is NYT add a minor sheen of intellectual language over the top to try obfuscate it.
- andrewksl 6y agoDo you have any links to articles you find particularly egregious?
- rorykoehler 6y agoWould you ask the same question about Fox News? It's a little redundant no?
- andrewksl 6y agoI wouldn't only because I've already seen enough examples of them impugning their credibility that I've been able to form my own conclusions. I wasn't aware that the NYT was considered equivalently and oppositely biased. The articles I have read have not put up any red flags for me, but I'm not closed off to the possibility that I've missed the signs or haven't read the right articles. Hence my question. I take it you think virtually all their reporting is sufficiently biased so as not to be considered trustworthy?
- rorykoehler 6y agoYes I would consider all reporting from NYT to be biased. However what they choose to print in their editorials is worth particular scrutiny.