Perhaps a "digital bill of rights"? > Earlier in his campaign, Yang said that data should be classified as property, and users should have certain rights over

Perhaps a "digital bill of rights"? > Earlier in his campaign, Yang said that data should be classified as property, and users should have certain rights over how their data is collected and used by tech companies. Yang offers more insight on what these rights would look like in Thursday’s proposal, and he pledges to pass a “Digital Bill of Rights, ensuring ownership of data, control over how it’s used, and compensation for its use” if he is elected president. https://www.theverge.com/2019/11/14/20964834/andrew-yang-digital-ads-tax-elizabeth-warren-antitrust-tech-facebook-google https://www.theverge.com/2019/11/14/20964834/andrew-yang-dig... And for a balance of opinion, a counter-argument on why this might be bad: > Or let's take the central element of yang's proposal, establishing data as a property right and allowing individuals to be compensated for the use of that data if it is used by a big tech company like Google or Facebook when selling to advertisers. This again is a bit of a problem as tech expert Gigi sohn said on this show recently. > Gigi makes a pretty convincing case there that actual ownership of your data could have a lot of problems, while the core underlying concern is more about data privacy. why not just tackle that instead? https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/470719-saagar-enjeti-yangs-plan-to-regulate-big-tech-misses-the-mark https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/470719-saagar-enjeti-yangs...