4 ms·
I would gladly pay $17 a year for a non-ad driven version of Facebook. If this were the limit of the value per user, they would have offered a subscription ser
by Zaskoda 6y ago
I would gladly pay $17 a year for a non-ad driven version of Facebook.
If this were the limit of the value per user, they would have offered a subscription service long ago. Something is missing from your model.
- danenania 6y agoIt’s likely that averages are very misleading for this kind of thing. People who are willing/able to pay FB not to see ads probably tend to have a lot more disposable income, and therefore are worth more to advertisers—potentially many times more than the average. There should be roughly as much variation in FB users’ value to FB as there is variation in disposable income across their whole userbase.