2 ms·
Thanks for the kind words, I think that crown is for MKL-DNN / OneDNN though, for now ;), and in the deep learning domain. I also expect Halide[1], Taichi[2],
by mratsim 6y ago
Thanks for the kind words, I think that crown is for MKL-DNN / OneDNN though, for now ;), and in the deep learning domain.
I also expect Halide[1], Taichi[2], DaCe[3] and Tiramisu[4] to be able to more easily reach those levels of performance hence why I want to add a compiler to Laser (implemented at compile-time via Nim macros) but prerequisite is excellent and composable multithreading support which OpenMP didn't provide.
In statistics / data analysis, my PCA though (Principal Component Analysis) beats all implementations I've seen from Scipy, Facebook and R.
[1]: https://halide-lang.org/ https://halide-lang.org/
[2]: https://github.com/taichi-dev/taichi https://github.com/taichi-dev/taichi
[3]: https://github.com/spcl/dace https://github.com/spcl/dace
[4]: http://tiramisu-compiler.org/ http://tiramisu-compiler.org/
- gavinray 6y agoI had seen Taichi (still not entirely sure what "Differentiable Computing" is!) and Tiramisu before but not Halide or DaCe. Neat =D For whatever it's worth, Arraymancer was #1 on Matmul benchmark (no claims to it being a realistic measure of realworld implementation) until what must have been only the last few weeks: https://github.com/kostya/benchmarks#matmul https://github.com/kostya/benchmarks#matmul At some point recently that D lang library snuck in the top spot.