4 ms·
Why does it need to be compared to any OS? One of the reasons I switched to Mac was the OS X was far more stable than Windows. I still want a stable OS.
by untog 6y ago
Why does it need to be compared to any OS? One of the reasons I switched to Mac was the OS X was far more stable than Windows. I still want a stable OS.
- jbverschoor 6y agoI have biweekly kernel panics on macOS... somewhere in the io sub system. Luckily vscode etc store their state
- ultrarunner 6y agoThis hasn't been my experience at all. I'm running a hackintosh of all things on vanilla x86 hardware and I haven't had a kernel panic for months (and even then the only thing I can think of was when I was screwing with something that's supposed be behind the curtain). Importantly, I'm more and more resolute against installing Catalina.
- VyperCard 6y agoThen you probably have a hardware defect somewhere
- jki275 6y agoYou have a hardware problem.
- tarsinge 6y agoI had maybe one or two kernel panics since OS 10.1 more than 15 years ago, even with hackintoshes or water damaged MacBooks, so that would be a real shame if that’s due to Catalina and it’s not a hardware problem.
- jbverschoor 6y agoI never reboot my laptop
- wvenable 6y ago> OS X was far more stable than Windows. I'm not sure that was ever true but certainly hasn't been true for over a decade. Neither OS is fully stable (how ever you might define that) and neither OS is a terrible unstable mess either.
- reaperducer 6y agoI'm not sure that was ever true I am. Absolutely sure. Stability was the reason I switched to Macintosh two decades ago. I've had to run Windows boxes for work at the same time, and with the exception of the most recent few years, Macs have been 100% more stable than Windows.