3 ms·
You are not in charge. If contenteditable is such a nuisance you can fix it, fill bugs and help with triage. I've been recently playing with it. There are so ma
by sergeykish 6y ago
You are not in charge. If contenteditable is such a nuisance you can fix it, fill bugs and help with triage. I've been recently playing with it. There are so many bugs like noone use it. A lot of people want WASM and drive it. It is not zero sum game.
There already several tiers of the browsers. Top tier opens competition with native/mobile. This may be huge - Windows, Mac, *nix, iOS, Android - universal application without walled garden.
Next tier works with mostly static content - NetSurf and Dillo. Dillo is fast, no need to throw away web. Any open source browser has entire history - pull and compile. First Mozilla check in is before Gecko - Layout Classic [1].
It is not browsers who ruins experience but authors. I browse without JS, it works.
[1] https://github.com/sergeykish/gecko-dev/tree/init/lib/layout https://github.com/sergeykish/gecko-dev/tree/init/lib/layout